Building Inclusive CPD: Designing Accessibility into Your Training from Day One

Creating truly inclusive Continuing Professional Development (CPD) programs is both a moral imperative and a strategic advantage. By designing accessibility in from the outset, providers open their offerings to a wider audience, reinforce brand reputation, and improve learner outcomes. At The CPD Board, we believe that accessibility is integral—not optional—to high‑quality CPD. Below are four key areas to guide your inclusive‑design journey.

1. The Business and Ethical Case for Inclusive Design

Accessibility delivers measurable return on investment while fulfilling ethical responsibilities. AFixt reports that organisations embracing inclusive design see increased market reach, stronger brand loyalty, and faster product innovation, beyond mere legal compliance [1]. Microsoft’s internal practice of embedding accessibility checks into Office 365 accelerated document accessibility and yielded productivity gains across global teams [2].

Ethically, inclusive CPD affirms the right of all professionals—regardless of ability—to access learning. The Global Business and Disability Network highlights that disabled consumers represent a purchasing power of £80 billion in the UK alone, underscoring the commercial rationale for accessibility [3]. Ethos and economics align: inclusive design expands impact, enhances learner satisfaction, and prevents reputational risk associated with exclusion.

2. Key Accessibility Standards (WCAG 2.1 AA) and How to Meet Them

The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 AA, published by W3C, is the global benchmark for digital accessibility [4]. It comprises principles—perceivable, operable, understandable, robust—with 50 success criteria at Level AA, covering contrast ratios, keyboard navigation, and more.

How to implement WCAG 2.1 AA

  • Use semantic HTML: Proper headings, lists, form labels, and landmarks ensure screen readers convey structure accurately.

  • Maintain colour contrast: Text and interactive elements must meet a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 against backgrounds.

  • Enable keyboard operability: All interactive components should be accessible via Tab, Enter, and Arrow keys, with visible focus indicators.

  • Provide text alternatives: ALT text for images, transcripts for audio, captions for video—these satisfy multiple WCAG criteria and support diverse learners.

Training organisations can upskill development teams via focused WCAG 2.1 AA workshops, such as those offered by Accessible.org, which deliver comprehensive training in just three hours [5]. Embedding accessibility expertise from the start reduces costly retrofits and ensures compliance.

3. Low‑Cost Adaptations That Make a Big Difference

Incorporating basic accessibility features need not break the budget. Simple, cost‑effective measures can radically improve inclusivity.

  • Captions and transcripts: Adding captions to video benefits learners who are deaf or hard of hearing, supports non‑native speakers, and aids comprehension in noisy environments. Many platforms—including YouTube and Zoom—offer automated captioning, which can be edited for accuracy [6].

  • Alt text for images: Writing meaningful ALT text lets screen‑reader users understand graphical content. Best practice is to describe the function or purpose of each image, rather than its appearance [7].

  • Adjustable pacing: Allow learners to pause, rewind, or slow down video segments. Providing downloadable slide decks and scripts enables self‑paced review without extra development cost.

  • Readable fonts and layouts: Use sans‑serif fonts at 16 px or larger, left‑aligned text, and ample line spacing. Such choices improve legibility for learners with visual or cognitive impairments.

Insync Insights emphasises that alt text and screen‑reader compatibility are foundational yet often overlooked; investing a few minutes per image yields outsized accessibility gains [8]. These adaptations not only comply with standards but demonstrate your organisation’s commitment to ALL learners.

4. Checklist for Running an Accessibility Pilot and Gathering Feedback

Before a full‑scale rollout, pilot your CPD program with an accessibility focus. The University of Washington’s online IT accessibility checklist provides a robust model, covering web pages, documents, multimedia, and LMS content [9]. Key steps include:

  1. Select a diverse pilot group: Recruit participants with a range of needs—visual, auditory, motor, cognitive—and gather baseline feedback.

  2. Run usability tests: Assign tasks (e.g., “Navigate to Module 3 and complete the quiz using only keyboard controls”) to uncover operability issues.

  3. Collect multi‑modal feedback: Use surveys, interviews, and screen‑recording analysis to capture quantitative scores (ease of navigation, content clarity) and qualitative insights (frustrations, suggestions).

  4. Audit with automated tools: Employ free tools like WAVE or axe to scan pages for WCAG infractions, then prioritize fixes.

  5. Iterate and document: Tackle high‑impact issues first—caption missing videos, fix form labels—then retest. Maintain an audit log of findings, actions taken, and final compliance status.

Continual Engine’s accessibility checklist further advises verifying color contrast, ensuring form controls have labels, and confirming that non‑text content has accessible equivalents [10]. By formalising your pilot process, you mitigate risk and deliver a polished, inclusive learning experience.

In Summary

Designing accessibility into CPD from day one is both the right thing to do and the smart business move. Organisations that pioneer inclusive learning reap rewards in market differentiation, learner loyalty, and regulatory assurance. By adhering to WCAG 2.1 AA, implementing low‑cost adaptations, and rigorously piloting your programs, you ensure that every professional, regardless of ability, can participate fully.

At The CPD Board, we guide providers through each step—combining best practices with practical tools. Join us in making CPD truly inclusive, expanding your reach, and elevating learning outcomes for all.

References

  1. The Business Case for Accessibility – AFixt, https://afixt.com/the-business-case-for-accessibility-why-inclusive-design-is-a-smart-investment/

  2. The Accessibility Advantage – Global Business and Disability Network, https://www.businessanddisability.org/sites/www/files/2024-03/Accenture-Accessibility-Advantage-PoV-FINAL.pdf

  3. Digital inclusion: the benefits of better web accessibility – The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/media-network/2014/nov/20/companies-benefits-digital-inclusion-accessibility

  4. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 AA – W3C, https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/

  5. WCAG 2.1 AA Training for Compliance – Accessible.org, https://accessible.org/wcag-21-aa-training/

  6. Making Online Learning Accessible to All Students – AACSB, https://www.aacsb.edu/insights/articles/2025/04/making-online-learning-accessible-to-all-students

  7. Accessible images: alternative text guidelines – Arizona State University, https://accessibility.asu.edu/articles/images

  8. Top Tools for Accessible Inclusive Virtual Classrooms – InSync Insights, https://blog.insynctraining.com/tools-accessible-inclusive

  9. Your Course Accessibility Checklist – Campus Technology, https://campustechnology.com/articles/2016/03/30/your-course-accessibility-checklist.aspx

  10. Complete Checklist to Make Your Online Course Accessible – Continual Engine, https://www.continualengine.com/blog/accessibility-checklist-for-online-courses/


Whether you’re an independent coach looking to distinguish your expertise or an organisation aiming to formalise and certify your training offerings, The CPD Board™ provides the framework, support, and recognition you need to stand out and drive real, measurable impact, backed by our reputation as the most affordable and quickest accreditor in the market. Join us in shaping the future of professional learning. Get in contact with us today.

Next
Next

5 Ways to Boost Learner Engagement in Virtual CPD Programs